Fourth of July is a time when Americans make a big deal about our freedoms. Freedom of religion, freedom of expression. Self-rule and freedom from oppression. Freedom of movement and career choice. Freedom to stockpile and use lethal weapons on one another. You’d think America would rank pretty high as a free and happy society.

But in reality, most Americans are neither free nor happy. And the reason is clear to see, codified for posterity right there in our Declaration of “Independence”:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

[Use of “unalienable” and lack of Oxford comma/semis are Jefferson’s. -o]

Paraphrased: We think Life is an inalienable Right. We think Liberty is an inalienable Right. And we think people are best occupied in an eternal, unending pursuit of more and better “Happiness”.

I would be reiterating a familiar refrain in pointing this out: forever chasing happiness will not lead you to the Garden of Eden; it’s better understood as a real-world manifestation of the eternal punishment of Tantalus. We’ve been taught from birth that no matter how much capital ‘H’ “Happiness” we obtain, we cannot ever be satisfied. We are compelled to eternally chase an elusive vision of future fulfillment that, by definition, cannot ever be achieved.

The mindless pursuit of more and better: do you call that freedom? I call that enslavement.

We are neither free nor happy because we are constantly cultivating unfulfilled wants, unrealized desires which society compels us are necessary before we can be happy. No matter how many “freedoms” we have, our nation’s economy and our individual lives are structured around our inability to ever achieve fulfillment. And no matter how many things we achieve or buy, our “Happiness” remains as distant as ever. This eternal hamster wheel of wanting something we don’t have is the very thing that makes us unhappy.

You think our country’s forefathers granted you enough freedoms to be truly free? You forgot about the single most important freedom of all: freedom from want.

The solution ought to be obvious to anyone who thinks rationally about it: if the pursuit of something cannot ever be achieved, then the pursuit must be abandoned.

To be truly happy, you must give up our founding fathers’ “pursuit of Happiness” and learn how to be not just okay, but happy with what you already have, and with the world as it is, complete with all its myriad problems and imperfections. The conclusion is Zen-like in its simplicity and profundity: to gain the thing you want, you have to let go of wanting that thing, and eventually abandon the very impulse of wanting itself.

Old people grok this more readily than the young. They’ve lived long enough to have acquired and achieved great things, seen how short-lived everything they worked for really was, and realized how little lasting happiness those things produced in the long run.

I can’t say I’ve freed myself from desire, but through my Buddhist meditation practice I’ve made surprising progress. By learning how to be at peace with life as it is, rather than chasing after life as it could possibly become, I’ve been happier, less worried about my status, more secure, less jealous, and more compassionate. By reducing my wants, I’ve adopted a much more a minimalist lifestyle, become more environmentally friendly as a result, and (perhaps ironically) become wealthier by wasting a much smaller percentage of my income on ephemera that ultimately prove unfulfilling.

Most important is that I’ve been “happier”. Lasting happiness cannot be achieved by pursuing it more and more intensely, but only by abandoning the chase and allowing oneself to actually *be* happy, in this and every moment, unconditionally and without disclaimer. Or the other way around: you will never *be* happy if you define happiness as something you don’t already have that you must eternally pursue.

America can only become the land of the free and the home of the brave if Americans become aware of and reject our “unalienable Right to the pursuit of Happiness”, which is just a tricky code phrase for the unending cycle of consumption and desire that keeps us enslaved to our petty wants.

Having been blogging for eight years now, you’d think I would have covered pretty much all my hot button issues. But no, humans—and Americans in particular—keep finding new and inventive ways to demonstrate that they “have been Educated Stupid,” as the infrequently-insightful Gene Ray would gladly tell you.

This particular rant was ignited by the following two gems. The first is this Globe article: Yamaha offers electric scooters for green errands. The second was an email a well-intentioned friend sent to me, which read:

We have an electric mower because B. wanted to use something greener than the traditional gas-powered.

These kinds of moronic statements utterly fail Critical Thinking 101. There is absolutely nothing greener about electric engines than gasoline engines.

It’s never been a secret that nearly all of this country’s electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels. To be more specific, this US Dept. of Energy report states that last year, 69.2 percent of the electricity generated in the US came from the burning of coal, coke, petroleum, natural gas, and other gases. And an additional 20.2 percent was generated at your friendly neighborhood nuclear power plant.

If you do the math, that means only 10 percent of our power comes from hydro and all other energy sources combined. That ratio means that running an electric car or lawn mower is at best only 10 percent more environmentally responsible than burning fossil fuels directly.

But it gets worse, because generating electricity in a power plant is not as efficient as fueling an engine with the equivalent volume of fossil fuel. An electrical plant must not just burn fossil fuel, but also inefficiently heat water to inefficiently drive immense steam turbines to inefficiently generate electricity which is then inefficiently transported hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles to the end user, who then probably stores it in an inefficient and environmentally hazardous battery before using it to perform work. Every step along the way contributes to making electricity less and less environmentally friendly than simply running a gasoline engine directly.

Sure, in theory someday we might generate more than a tiny fraction of our electricity from hydro plus solar plus wind plus tidal, but that just isn’t the present reality. Right now, almost all the electricity you use comes from power plants that burn fossil fuels, which simply centralizes the environmental devastation of burning oil, coal, and gasoline and hides the evidence from the end user. Somehow Americans—including all those smug, misinformed Prius owners—have become stupid enough to believe that just because they don’t see the pollution themselves, they think it isn’t happening.

Well, it is happening. Our finite reserves of fossil fuels are being depleted and pollution is being released every single time you tap into the electrical grid, whether it’s to recharge your precious iPad, to waste your hours playing Halo 3, or to power your “environmentally friendly” Prius.

“Zero emissions” doesn’t actually mean zero emissions, people!

So yeah. I have an issue with people who think using electricity is any “greener” than using fossil fuels.

Frequent topics