My expectations for solar power were set by the dim liquid crystal watches and calculators of the 1970s, which wouldn’t work at all unless they were in direct sunlight.

For decades, advocates have talked about solar panels getting cheaper and more efficient, but I always dismissed it as marketing-speak, until a recent purchase changed my mind.

Some background… Life in Austin has come with an occasional brief loss of electrical power during stormy weather. And since our house is at the very end of a small electrical line that runs up a wooded creek, downed limbs and squirrels chewing through cables have produced a daylong outage once every year or two. And although it was before we arrived, the locals still remember the trauma of Snowmageddon, when the regional power grid was down for several days.

Jackery

With that as backdrop, last Thanksgiving I pulled the trigger on something I’d long considered: a small, portable battery and solar panel.

Lemme diverge by saying that this is not a sponsored post. Orny don’t do that shit, period. I’m not a money-grubbing millennial influencer; I’m a Boomer with a modicum of integrity and self-respect. That said…

The storage unit is about the size of a car battery, and the solar panel (when folded in half) is about the size and weight of a box fan (but thinner). Specifically, I got a Jackery 300W battery and a 100W panel. It’s got two standard 110V outlets, two USB-A and one USB-C ports, and a 12V DC (car cigarette lighter) plug. While it listed for $499, I was pleased to get it for $299 on a Black Friday sale. Although there are many manufacturers, I chose Jackery because of a DC Rainmaker recommendation and my own personal satisfaction with one of their lipstick-case sized mini power banks.

I got this much-larger-but-still-modest unit because I wanted something simple and portable that could get us through a minor outage. It isn’t gonna run major appliances, but it will easily handle phones and lights. It’ll charge laptops and run our fiber optic internet & wifi modem, though it won’t last long with heavy usage. Jackery makes units with vastly more capacity, but I got this to fulfill our basic needs, and as a proof of concept rather than a complete power backup system.

In practice, it’s been a low-key eye-opener. Setting the panel up in the backyard for a couple hours yields enough power to run the dozens of devices I use that are smaller than a laptop for a couple weeks.

While I hadn’t expected it, I found myself using it daily. Why would I pay the electric company to charge my electronics, when I could do it at zero cost, with power I harvested from my own backyard? Suddenly, I saw how quickly a solar power generator would pay for itself, since “free” is a much better deal than “cheap”. So when I need to power anything, my first thought now is to use the power bank, rather than plugging into a wall socket. That was an unexpected mind-shift.

The other benefit that I (perhaps stupidly) hadn’t foreseen will play out during an extended power outage. Say my battery happens to have 60% charge when the electricity goes out. Sure, that’ll be enough power to last a little while, but it’ll run out of juice during an extended outage. But wait… Remember that it’s charged by sunlight, so – even without power – we can just charge it right back up to full, so long as there’s at least partial sun. It’s not just a storage device; with the accompanying solar panel, it’s an inexhaustible power generator, which can produce additional power now matter how long the electrical grid might be down. And unlike most home backup generators, it doesn’t require gasoline to run, doesn’t emit toxic exhaust fumes, and is completely silent.

So yeah, this very small and modest proof of concept has unexpectedly turned me into a solar convert. Whether at an individual level or scaled up to regional power-generation, solar power is inexhaustible and can be harvested at essentially zero cost, save for an initial investment in equipment that is quickly recouped. Whether you’re a multi-state power producer or just one cheap schmuck living alone, the economics of solar power are now surprisingly compelling, as advocated in this (lengthy!) Technology Connections video. Which is pretty shocking to someone who remembers those feeble solar watches and calculators from 50 years ago.

Mr. Clean

Jan. 31st, 2017 04:16 pm

With so many environmentally-conscious people replacing fossil fuels for electric power for their cars and household gadgets, it’s time for a bit of a sanity check.

US electricity generation chart

While your modern electric vehicle does have lower emissions than older cars, you’re forgetting to take into account the pollution caused by generating the electricity it needs. As you can see in the US Energy Information Administration Electricity Generation chart at right, two-thirds of our electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels to boil water and power steam turbines. And another 20 percent comes from nuclear power. Bottom line: only 10 percent of the electricity you use comes from a clean, renewable source.

The pollutants, greenhouse gases, and waste heat produced by individual petroleum-powered vehicles have only been hidden: transferred from your tailpipe to massive power plants that are conveniently not in your back yard.

You might think that those facilities do a better job handling the negative impacts of fossil fuels than millions of internal combustion engines. However, there’s immense inefficiency involved in burning tons of coal to boil water to turn steam turbines, store and transmit the resulting electricity far across country to your convenient location, and then condense the steam, cool the water, trap the pollutants, and at the same time rake in enough money to keep the utility companies economically viable. And outside of governmental regulation, utilities have no economic incentive to reduce the negative side effects of power generation.

Proclaiming that electric power is any “greener” than fossil fuels—when two-thirds of our electricity comes directly from burning fossil fuels—is just as disingenuous as flat earthers, holocaust deniers, anti-vaxxers, and Kim Jong-Trump’s Twitter feed.

Thanks to Fox News, Donald Trump, and the radical right, we live in a post-truth world; so if you want to feel self-righteous about doing your part to stop global warming, feel free to create your own “facts”.

But if you live in the real world, there are only two ways to become greener: to utilize cleaner methods to generate power, or to use less power. Neither of those are easy, as evinced by America’s lack of meaningful progress since the ecology movement began nearly fifty years ago.

A quick post about my most recent read: David Byrne’s “Bicycle Diaries”. Yes, that David Byrne. It’s really more about his observations based on various cities he visited than it is about cycling, so it’s not surprising that the two bits I want to share from it have absolutely nothing to do with the bike.

Bicycle Diaries

In his section on Berlin, he talks about the Stasi, the East German secret police:

The combination of psychological and Orwellian horror is hellish and weirdly seductive. The agency was known for turning citizens against their neighbors by subtle pressure, implied threats, or economic incentives. It seems it’s something that many national security agencies do from time to time. (“If you see something, say something.”) Turning the citizenry into rats makes the entire populace scared and docile, and after a while no one knows who’s informing on whom.

The quoted phrase rings loudly in any Bostonian’s ears, because the MBTA transit police have been drumming those exact words (authored by the Department of Homeland Security) into our heads for more than eight years, encouraging us (as described here) to be on the lookout for anyone carrying a backpack, holding an aerosol can, or “acting in a rehearsed manner”.

Orwell’s rep as a visionary becomes that much more impressive when you realize that he was only off by 17 years.

The other interesting bit was a quote from Enrique Peñalosa, former mayor of Bogotá, which goes like this:

In developing-world cities, the majority of people don’t have cars, so I will say, when you construct a good sidewalk, you are constructing democracy. A sidewalk is a symbol of equality… If democracy is to prevail, public good must prevail over private interests.

His perspective in that last sentence is profoundly interesting for those of us in 21th Century America, torn as we are between the American dream of freedom to acquire and amass unlimited wealth and the protests of the Occupy movement, which make it abundantly clear that the American dream is inaccessible to most, and has resulted in an unsustainable concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small elite minority.

Just some thoughts, sadly having nothing to do with cycling whatsoever.

Having been blogging for eight years now, you’d think I would have covered pretty much all my hot button issues. But no, humans—and Americans in particular—keep finding new and inventive ways to demonstrate that they “have been Educated Stupid,” as the infrequently-insightful Gene Ray would gladly tell you.

This particular rant was ignited by the following two gems. The first is this Globe article: Yamaha offers electric scooters for green errands. The second was an email a well-intentioned friend sent to me, which read:

We have an electric mower because B. wanted to use something greener than the traditional gas-powered.

These kinds of moronic statements utterly fail Critical Thinking 101. There is absolutely nothing greener about electric engines than gasoline engines.

It’s never been a secret that nearly all of this country’s electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels. To be more specific, this US Dept. of Energy report states that last year, 69.2 percent of the electricity generated in the US came from the burning of coal, coke, petroleum, natural gas, and other gases. And an additional 20.2 percent was generated at your friendly neighborhood nuclear power plant.

If you do the math, that means only 10 percent of our power comes from hydro and all other energy sources combined. That ratio means that running an electric car or lawn mower is at best only 10 percent more environmentally responsible than burning fossil fuels directly.

But it gets worse, because generating electricity in a power plant is not as efficient as fueling an engine with the equivalent volume of fossil fuel. An electrical plant must not just burn fossil fuel, but also inefficiently heat water to inefficiently drive immense steam turbines to inefficiently generate electricity which is then inefficiently transported hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles to the end user, who then probably stores it in an inefficient and environmentally hazardous battery before using it to perform work. Every step along the way contributes to making electricity less and less environmentally friendly than simply running a gasoline engine directly.

Sure, in theory someday we might generate more than a tiny fraction of our electricity from hydro plus solar plus wind plus tidal, but that just isn’t the present reality. Right now, almost all the electricity you use comes from power plants that burn fossil fuels, which simply centralizes the environmental devastation of burning oil, coal, and gasoline and hides the evidence from the end user. Somehow Americans—including all those smug, misinformed Prius owners—have become stupid enough to believe that just because they don’t see the pollution themselves, they think it isn’t happening.

Well, it is happening. Our finite reserves of fossil fuels are being depleted and pollution is being released every single time you tap into the electrical grid, whether it’s to recharge your precious iPad, to waste your hours playing Halo 3, or to power your “environmentally friendly” Prius.

“Zero emissions” doesn’t actually mean zero emissions, people!

So yeah. I have an issue with people who think using electricity is any “greener” than using fossil fuels.

Frequent topics