Inna wanted to go to the 2017 Meetin national celebration in Seattle in September, and it made sense to piggyback that with a detour up to Victoria BC to visit my brother, since—after my mother’s death—he’s unlikely to be coming east any longer.

The logistics were enough of a nightmare that we actually needed a travel agent’s services. Inna and her mother flew direct to SFO to visit family for a few days. Then Inna flew OAK (not SFO) to SEA while I simultaneously got from PIT to SEA via IAD. After the Meetin gathering, we’d take the ferry to Victoria BC, then eventually get home flying Air Canada together from YYJ to YYZ to PIT. Meanwhile, Inna’s mother returned on a direct flight from SFO. Yeah. Glad to have an agent handle all that.

Seattle Skyline & Rainier

Seattle Skyline & Rainier

Danger Man

Danger Man

Self-Portrait in Steel

Self-Portrait in Steel

Inna's on the Ball

Inna's on the Ball

The Sky's the Limit

The Sky's the Limit

Family @ Observatory Hill

Family @ Observatory Hill

Sunken Garden

Sunken Garden

Japanese Garden

Japanese Garden

Full Seattle photoset

Full Victoria photoset

Tuesday, the day before I left, was memorable for two reasons.

First, having just gotten over a three-week long summer cold, I woke up with another sore throat, heralding another ugly illness spanning the duration of the trip.

Second, that evening I had a ticket to go see Walk With Me, a movie centered around Buddhist icon Thich Nhat Hanh’s meditative community at Plum Village. Between this and other previous films, I’ve become convinced that the medium of film really isn’t a good vehicle for introducing Buddhist philosophy to the masses. But that’s really not a topic for this blogpost…

After I returned home, my sore throat left me with a sleepless night before an early Wednesday morning walk to the bus stop, then a two-bus expedition out to the Pittsburgh airport. Having lived without owning a car for more than twenty years, I hadn’t even thought about driving!

My first flight—from Pittsburgh to DC—was delayed 30 minutes by a maintenance issue, causing me to skip my planned combined breakfast and lunch as I loped through Dulles seeking my connecting flight.

After five hours with absolutely zero legroom in a United cattle car, I touched down at SeaTac hungry, tired, and sick. I ignored the seventeen text messages from our catsitting friend and hoofed it to the Uber lot to meet up with Inna, who had flown in separately from Oakland CA.

Although I’ve made half a dozen trips to the PNW, I’d never been to Seattle, so everything here was new to me.

After a lengthy drive into downtown Seattle, we tried to check into our hotel—the Inn at the WAC—only to discover that our room wasn’t ready. We had only planned to drop our bags before heading out for dinner anyways, so we simply got a recommendation from the desk clerk and headed straight to the nearby Tap House Grill. I had a French dip sandwich and ice cream, while Inna ordered shrimp and tiramisu ice cream, which wound up being her favorite meal of the trip.

We returned to the hotel to find a tray with hot tea, cocoa, a chocolate bar, and a handwritten note—to Mr. and Mrs. Nirenburg—waiting in our room, since the staff had overheard Inna mentioning my illness. Inna tracked down Sheela and Monika, our Pittsburgh friends who were also attending the Meetin gathering, and the four of us chatted briefly in our room. After a long day of travel for me, we opted to skip arrival-day festivities in favor of rest and a quiet evening in bed.

Thursday morning we were up early to join a small group of Meetin people exploring Pike Place Market. Along the way, I snagged a cinnamon bun for breakfast. We observed the market’s outdated manual daily stall-assignment ceremony, then took a brief guided tour with still more Meetin peeps. With tired legs, Inna and I wandered off for some overpriced ice cream. Then I spied a stall selling roasted corn on the cob, but balked at the ludicrous $5 price tag. We both eyed the beautiful ristra hot pepper arrangements—each for different reasons—but realized they would be impossible to transport back to Pittsburgh.

We joined another big Meetin group for lunch at the Pike Brewing Company, but left before ordering when Inna realized she wasn’t sure if she had forgotten her medications in San Francisco. That led to an afternoon of phone tag with doctors and chasing around drugstores before we returned to the hotel, where she found them hidden in the bottom of her bag.

But along the way, Inna picked up some dahlias for our room, and I ducked into Metsker Maps, where a postcard with a bicycle and the phrase “Conquer the Hill” called out to me in anticipation of my upcoming Dirty Dozen ride.

Tired after so much walking, we were content to rest in the hotel until the evening event: a meet-and-greet at the top of Smith Tower. On the way, we experienced elevator malfunctions in both our hotel and our destination. Smith Tower is a lot like Boston’s Custom House Tower. Both are about 35 stories and 490 feet tall, with an open-air skywalk observation deck at the top. We took a few pictures of the view, then went in to chat with other Meetin folks. Those included Mary McDaid (Portland OR), event organizers Anita Christensen (Portland) and Helene Pincus (Las Vegas), and I had to interrogate Deanna Cochener, whose cellphone case loudly announced that she was a Portland Timbers supporter.

Afterward we wandered around with Monika, stopping to admire the Seattle Public Library. The steep hills in downtown Seattle were vaguely reminiscent of Pittsburgh, and we shared an uncomfortable laugh when one woman apologized to us as her dog’s feces literally rolled and bounced down the steep sidewalk into our path. In Westlake Park plaza we found a giant-sized Connect Four game, and I promptly destroyed Inna twice running, despite never having played before. The girls stopped in a mall for Pike Place Chowder, while I brought a theoretically fast Mod Pizza back to the room.

Friday was really the main Meetin day. After Uber failed us—and charged us anyways—we got ourselves invited to share a Lyft summoned by New Yorkers Ricky Evans & Zhenya Brisker. That dropped us at the morning’s activity: a duck tour. While waiting, Inna & I chatted with Laurelee Langan, who was there representing Boston. Despite my having been through at least two dozen duck tours, the tour itself was fine, featuring Amazon’s HQ, the Fremont Troll, houseboats and floatplanes on Lake Union, and lots more. Near the Belltown Apartments, the tour guide indicated we were passing through a quiet zone, which I happily observed, having lived for ten years on the Boston duck tour route myself.

Afterward, rather than spending $33 each to get into the Museum of Pop Culture, we opted to visit a local food court with Sheela and Portlanders Bijana & Ankesh Kadakia. Still illin’, nothing appealed to me but fries.

After lunch, the “Meeps” gathered up again to go through the Chihuly Garden and Glass museum. The exhibit was short but breathtaking. In the middle of the tour, I remembered to show people that the abstract background image on my cellphone has for many years been a close-up of a green-and-yellow work of Chihuly glass that I took back at the 2000 Dargon Summit at Pittsburgh’s Phipps Conservatory, which you can see here.

After that, Inna and I returned briefly to the food court before walking down to the Olympic Sculpture Park and rejoining the larger group. We wandered around, enjoying another warm, sunny afternoon. While resting at one point, a kid ran up to Inna asking in an incredulous voice, “Hey lady, is that your belly?!?” She was taken aback but about to respond affirmatively when the kid’s caretaker came up to explain that the kid wasn’t actually referring to her stomach, but the rumbling sound of a nearby passing train!

I walked down to the harborside, having a nice conversation with Bijana, before the group split again, with most people headed predictably toward a bar. Meanwhile, Cha Cha Chen (DC) and I collected Inna and ambled off to meet Anita and the main group of Meeps for a ride up the Space Needle.

The Space Needle was a lot like Boston’s Customs House Tower and the Smith Tower from the day before: a reception room and elevators surrounded by a narrow exterior observation deck. The main difference is that the Needle was crowded to absolute capacity. But it did provide the requisite view of the city, the bay, and the mountains in the distance.

Inna & I were among the first to punt and make our way to the Belltown Pub, the first stop in the group’s planned bar crawl. I had a chicken sandwich and a cookie while we chatted with Helene and Ricky. Eventually we’d skip the bar crawl and drag Helene, Ricky, Zhenya, Sheela, and Monika back to the hotel’s common room for an evening of games: specifically Cheating Moth and Coup.

Saturday that same group got together for breakfast, having been lured away from the Meetin brunch by the promise of Quaffles—waffles made out of croissant dough and cinnamon—at Anchorhead Coffee. On the way there, we posed beneath a huge flower pot and watering can sculpture, and got unexpectedly sprayed with water. The Quaffles made up for it, as probably the best food we had during the entire trip.

Having no interest in the Meetin group activities planned for that day, Inna and I shooed the others away and walked aimlessly around the city, winding up at a Russian bakery called Piroshky Piroshky that Inna had sought out. She sampled their pelmeni (little dumplings), piroshki (potato and cabbage dumplings), and Napoleon cake, but pronounced them all mediocre. Then back to Pioneer Square, where I dragged Inna into Magic Mouse Toys and picked up perennial favorite Fluxx, while waiting for our underground tour.

In brief, Seattle used to have problematic above-ground sewage pipes. Then, after Seattle’s big fire, they decided to put them underground… Not by digging trenches, but by running them down the middle of the street, then filling them over and putting an elevated street over the top. Meanwhile, as buildings were being rebuilt, owners were required to build their primary entrances on the second floor, rather than the first. Wooden planks allowed people to get from the elevated street to the elevated second-floor entrances, spanning the open pits that was the old sidewalks, since they were still at the former street level. The old sidewalks were never filled in, just eventually roofed over, leaving downtown Seattle a maze of underground sidewalks connecting the basements (former first floors) of the surrounding buildings. Much of this work was financed by the mistress of several houses of ill repute. It was an interesting tour.

After that, we wandered around town some more, checking out Seattle’s K&L Gates building, the “Pittsburgh” Lunch, and so forth. Then hopped an Uber to take us to the suburban Seattle Meowtropolitan cat cafe, where we enjoyed some time with a few blasé felines. After an Uber back, I picked up a very yummy dinner from Mae Phim Thai. I spent the evening resting in the hotel room while Inna rejoined the Meetin crew for karaoke.

It felt odd to me, because the Meetin event was nominally a weekend thing, but we’d spent the entire day Saturday on our own. It felt like the social element of the trip had petered out, doubly so because our ferry to Victoria prohibited us from attending the farewell brunch on Sunday.

So the next morning we slept in a little, had a decent breakfast in the hotel, ran into Ricky and Zhenya in the lobby, and made our way to the ferry.

Looking back on Seattle, it seemed an okay town, but throughout its history it seems to have been very poorly slapped together, whether you’re thinking about their former sewage problems or the current explosive growth accompanying Microsoft and Amazon. We did have absolutely gorgeous, sunny weather up until the day we departed, but it’s probably a lot less fun in the rain. The accommodations were really great, except for the horrible elevators. My cold was mostly manageable, but I did wish I’d had the strength to bring my SLR camera along. And the Meetin group were generally enjoyable, although predictably more party- and drinking-oriented than Inna and I.

But overall, I really enjoyed my time in Seattle and could have stayed longer.

At the dock, our Victoria Clipper ferry bobbed and weaved in the wind-blown rain and heavy seas, and Inna didn’t have a particularly pleasant 90 minutes crossing over to Victoria. And as expected, we didn’t get passport stamps for our entry into Canada; cheap bastards.

However, by the time we docked, the seas had calmed and the sun was out, and we walked through downtown and past the Empress Hotel on the way to our lodgings at the Hotel Rialto. After nearly a year, it was really, really enjoyable to be outside the authority of the Trump Presidency. Tired from our journey, we had Indian at nearby Sizzling Tandoor before going back to the hotel and crashing.

Monday I let Inna sleep late, then we hoofed it through Chinatown to pick up our rental car, where we wound up with a RAV4 rather than a VW because the Hertz dealer somehow lost the keys when he got out of the vehicle after driving it up. We’d hoped to drive along the coastline of Vancouver Island up to my brother’s home, but had to settle for the inland highway because they were pressed for time.

We had Thai food for lunch and a nice visit with my brother, plus my sister-in-law, whom I haven’t seen in several years. We took separate cars and met up at the top of Observatory Hill for a brisk but breathtaking panoramic view of the island. Then they headed home while I took Inna up to Victoria’s famous Butchart Gardens.

The gardens were predictably amazing, and predictably crowded. What didn’t run according to plan was the weather, as the predicted day-long rain held off completely. Inna bought me some gelato in the Italian garden, and we took our time enjoying the scenery.

Tired from the walking we’d done all week, we gave up on dinner and just got some basics at 7-Eleven, including some products that you’d have to find in imported food shops at home.

Tuesday morning we wandered around downtown a bit. We looked into the John Fluevog shoe store, chatted with the proprietor of North48 Bicycles, perused the surprisingly well-stocked MEC sporting goods co-op (c.f. REI), and discovered Baggins Shoes, who will print any custom design you want onto a pair of Chuck Taylors or Vans. Then we had brunch with my brother at Willy’s, a diner in town. Sadly, my sister-in-law’s back trouble prevented her from tagging along.

After saying farewell to my brother, Inna and I moseyed down to Craigdarroch Castle—a Victorian mansion rather than a medieval castle, of course—which was cute but not particularly engaging, though Inna found some interest in the stained glass and examples of actual filled-out “dance cards”. By the time we dragged ourselves back to the hotel, we were both completely done with the walking and tourist thing and ready to go home. We had dinner at the hotel—a cube of mac and cheese, topped with tandoori chicken!—before showering, checking into our homeward flights, and turning in.

Wednesday we were up and out, with a quick drive up to Victoria’s leetle jetport. Our Air Canada flight to Toronto was long but uneventful. YYZ was a nightmare of maze-like corridors, eventually leading to a mid-corridor dungeon of a waiting area, with a tileless suspended ceiling and bare light fixtures dangling from their wires. Impatient to get home, we took an Uber from the airport rather than wait for the bus, and were very happy to arrive.

Inna enjoyed Victoria and would have liked to have spent more time there. Like Seattle, we were very fortunate to enjoy unseasonable and atypically good weather. It was especially nice to see my sister-in-law, since her health hasn’t permitted her to travel for some time.

Between the two cities, it was a pretty successful trip, though as always it was really nice to get back home again.

Last night I attended the Reel Paddling Film Festival at the Kendall, a three-hour collection of the best kayaking and canoeing films of the year.

On the way in, organizers asked attendees to register for two raffles. I didn’t bother registering for the national raffle, both because the odds are long and because I have no use whatsoever for a car rack. But I filled out an entry for the local raffle, since the prizes included a PFD, Teva footwear (ironically, I’d bought a pair just last week), and various passes to Charles River Kayak, the guys I rent boats from.

Over the years, I’ve developed a belief that rumpled raffle tickets have a much better chance of getting pulled from a hat than crisp, uniform tickets. So before I put my entry card in the box, I creased it both lengthwise and breadthwise, then creased each corner in opposing directions: forward, backward, forward, backward.

cap

By now you should be able to guess where this is headed: when the intermission came around and the raffle was held, my ticket was the very first one pulled. Bingo!

Unfortunately, the first items they chose to raffle were Headsweats race caps, so I didn’t win any Tevas or boat rentals or the PFD. But as caps go, it’s a very nice one, since it’s made of the same CoolMax fabric used in most cyclingwear. In fact, it’d make a nice cycling hat, except that I’d have to cut back the brim, which was made extra long for paddlers of course.

With about 150 people in the audience, the odds of my winning weren’t astronomical, but it’s very interesting that after taking such care to differentiate my ticket from everyone else’s, my name was the first one chosen.

Mixed Nuts

Apr. 1st, 2010 10:48 am

Somewhere in my travels I came across this contrarian secret about Buddhist teacher interviews: if you express anxiety or confusion at an interview, the teacher’s job is to reassure you and give you confidence; whereas if you show up confident and in control, their job is to present you with deeper or more difficult challenges, to spur you to undertake greater effort.

The latter was my experience in a recent interview I had with Michael, one of the teachers at CIMC. I began by telling him that I was fairly satisfied with my life and that when I meditate, no pressing issues seem to come up for me.

I told him that in general I am on top of things, using my planning and organizational strengths to mitigate the risk involved in anything I commit to or undertake. When that happens, he suggested that I examine the energy level and the motive behind the actions I am taking, because sometimes that impulse to have everything under control is driven by fear or anxiety, rather than wisdom.

He then asked whether I had any suffering in my life or any deeply buried insecurities or fears. While my life is generally quite good, of course even I have a couple things I keep way down in the murky depths. Without getting all personal about my own particular demons, it’s important to be able to allow those feelings to reveal themselves, rather than to instinctively suppress them, so that one can then make choices and act out of wisdom rather than reactiveness.

So I left that interview with a bit more anxiety, and more of a sense that I need to do a better job admitting and facing the things I fear, rather than burying them. Joy.

Later that week we held another dharma movie night. I had proposed the animated film “Waking Life”, which is stuffed with philosophical meanderings. Even though it’s mostly a bunch of talking heads, and not everyone is as fascinated by philosophy as I am, I expected people to find it thought-provoking. I might have even hoped it would receive as positive a response as my book club selection had.

But before the movie began, we got into a discussion of our next book club selection: Mark Epstein’s “Open to Desire: The Truth About What the Buddha Taught”. When I was asked my opinion, I was honest: I think the book is logically flawed, ridiculously deluded, and dangerously misleading. On the other hand, a couple people enthusiastically loved it, and wanted me to explain why I disagreed with it. As the only person to openly criticize the book, I was on the defensive, and at a disadvantage because it had been a month and a half since I’d read it, and I didn’t have my notes to refer to. So that unexpected discussion left me feeling a bit singled out.

Then we started the movie, which got a predominantly negative reception. In fact, about a third of the way in, four people (out of nine) got up and walked out of the room, spending the rest of the evening outside on the patio rather than watching the rest of the movie. While I have no problem allowing people to make their own decisions, and I know that disliking the movie isn’t the same as disliking me as a person, I still had some emotional turmoil to work through as a result of their surprisingly blunt rejection of something that has a lot of personal and philosophical meaning to me.

In between those two events, CIMC had a dharma talk by Winnie Nazarko that related to creativity. While the talk didn’t touch any nerves for me, one point she made has stayed with me. In general, people engage in a meditative practice because they’re looking for something, whether it’s the answer to a personal dilemma or relief from generalized existential angst. Winnie emphasized the importance of knowing what your overriding question is, so that you can judge whether or not you’re on the path toward an answer.

When I considered that question for myself, two responses came immediately to mind. The first is my familiar refrain of how to live my life such that I will have no regrets on my deathbed, as I discussed here. The other is to learn how to make decisions which are more consistent with my deeper sense of personal ethics and reflect the person I aspire to be and the kind of world I want to manifest. I think it’s a positive sign that those answers came so easily to me, because it shows that I have a clear understanding of why I practice and what I hope to achieve.

And last night at CIMC Maddy held a dharma talk on generosity, and how it is the basis of practice. As we age, we have to let go of everything we have—our possessions, our relationships, our health, and eventually our lives—and the essence of the spiritual path is learning how to be at peace with that process so that we can both live and die with grace and fulfillment.

If that is so, then acts of generosity are a good way to see if we can let go of our possessions, and what it feels like to do so. By exercising our ability to see beyond our attachment to material possessions, we are practicing and becoming more familiar with the kind of letting go that we must all eventually become accustomed to facing.

On top of that, generosity is a truly ennobling act that is a demonstration that one cares about others’ suffering. And it provides fulfillment beforehand (in contemplating giving), during (in the act of giving), and afterward (in the memory of having given). There aren’t many actions one can take that are so pure and have so many positive effects, both for others as well as for oneself.

Last night I went to see "Examined Life", film wherein the filmmaker gives a dozen-odd modern philosophers ten minutes each to pontificate.

The 2008 film reminded me far too much of a less skilfully done version of Richard Linklater’s 2001 animated movie "Waking Life". The parallels are too many to ignore: the same loosely-related episodic format of someone discussing philosophy with the protagonist/narrator; the same incorporation of striking background settings and jazzy music to lend an atmospheric air to the monologues; the same toeing the line between genuine hopefulness and sarcastic postmodern cynicism; even the same walking/strolling visual motif. Despite the inarguable validity of the Plato quote, the parallel between the movie titles—Waking Life versus Examined Life—is so close as to imply subconscious (if not conscious) appropriation.

Aside from the facts that the newer film is not animated and the philosophers are real people, the main dissimilarity is the fact that unlike Waking Life, Examined Life has no overarching storyline to bring it all together. In the end, it’s just a bunch of talking heads with separate agendas, one talking about environmentalism, another about disabilities, another about gender, and so on, and neither they nor the director make any attempt to connect the disparate issues and bring them into a coherent whole. It’s a movie with no message, no direction, no conscious intent, which leaves one with the lingering question: is the unexamined movie worth seeing?

poster

Despite that shortcoming, each scene did have value within its own context, and I came away with what, to me, were three interesting thoughts.

The first is the most obvious, and the ultimate reason for philosophy’s existence and importance. Most people look outside themselves for some source to define their ethics, whether that be the Biblical God or a political ideology or whatever. But in an era when most intellectuals have denied the existence of a supreme being, that raises the question of whether we should try to live an ethical life, and where our ethics should come from. The obvious answer is to look within: you are acting ethically when your actions are aligned with your values, and it’s the examination of those values that provides us with direction. And lest anyone think that ethics are outmoded in a largely secular culture, I point out that our ethics and our values are what guide every decision we make. Our ethics may look somewhat different than those of modern or historical Christians, but that does not mean that we do not live by certain ethical precepts.

Another interesting point was made by Cornel West. He said that courage—courage to think for ourselves, the courage to express our love, and the courage to manifest our beliefs in this selfish world—is the most critical attribute for a modern philosopher. I found that very interesting, and very apropos to my Buddhist studies. It’s something I hope to share with my dharma friends in the near future.

My final thought makes a connection between philosophy and superstition, between this movie and a number of upcoming local events. When faced with life or death or natural disasters, humans try to assign meaning to the event: it is God’s will, or the evolutionary imperative, or the material dialectic. Finding meaning and patterns of cause and effect are what human brains are wired to do; even when there is clearly no meaning, we create theories, like the Polynesian islander whose cargo cult tells him that huge silver birds magically bestow chocolate and cigarettes upon his people. Our ideas about the unanswerable, unknowable facts of life, death, and natural disasters are no more than superstitions created by a brain that evolved to find meaning in every event it observes.

I made this connection after reading a bit about a handful of very interesting and related author talks that are coming up. Tomorrow, cognitive neuroscientist Bruce M. Hood will be speaking about his book "SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable", which explores this very topic. A week later, Gary Marcus discusses his book "Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind", which asserts that our brains are the result of a random evolutionary process that piled new systems on top of old ones, resulting in an imperfect and inconsistent facility. Finally, a week after that, Alva Noë talks about his "Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness".

It’s quite a month for thinkers!

These kind are always my favorite. They’re particularly revealing, and I can show off my retentiveness for knowing precise answers.

What was the last song you heard?
The entire 1978 Devo “Q: Are We Not Men?” disc; the final song was “Shrivel-Up”.
 
What were the last two movies you saw?
LotR:RotK and “Shaolin Soccer”.
 
What were the last three things you purchased?
During today’s class I bought a Cherry Coke and a Häagen-Dazs ice cream bar. Before that was a $40 grocery trip wherein I saved 23% thanks to my Shaws card; highlighted items include buttery microwave popcorn, black peppercorns, blueberry sorbet, OJ, corn, peas, and Mini Rollo Bites. Before that, a case of assorted “Sci Di” cat fud (sic).
 
What four things do you need to do this weekend?
Pay bills, distribute DargonZine 17-2, print a new 2-week planner, and assemble [livejournal.com profile] iniren’s new desk after disassembling her old one.
 
Who are the last five people you talked to?
I’ll give you a few extras, since not all these may count. The Puggle; I thanked a neighbor for holding the door; while waiting for tax help at the BPL, I had a conversation with a guy who filmed the PMC a few years ago, and a quick comment to another guy as I left, and a quick inquiry of which conference room it was in from the help desk; and before all that I spoke to several classmates and my instructor, Ken, at digital photography class.

I think it's appropriate to post my thoughts on the collected Lord of the Rings movies here. As I say, I was a rather obsessive Tolkien fan back in high school, so I think these opinions are fairly authoritative. On the other hand, everyone and his mother are Tolkien scholars these days, and they're all pontificating about the movies, so perhaps these observations will be of little value to anyone but myself.

LORD OF THE RINGS: THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING

When I was young, I was a major league Tolkien fan. I was one of the founding members of the New England Tolkien Society and edited their annual literary journal, Mazar Balinû. Yes, I had a hobbit name, too: Ornoth Sûlhimdil Brandybuck.

My reaction to "the Fellowship of the Ring" movie is very favorable. They certainly did a far better job than Ralph Bakshi in 1978 or Rank-and Base (sic) in '80. For the most part, the movie took great pains to stay true to the book, and most of the depictions were absolutely right on. But you want to know what was missing, don't you?

Well, my biggest criticism is that the movie didn't capture the sense of wonder that I associate with high fantasy. While the scenery was impressive, it just didn't provide the almost spiritual beauty of the primeval Middle Earth.

On the whole, I was disappointed with the portrayal of Tolkien's Elves. They initially appear as powerfully angelic, but after their initial introduction, they settle down to be nothing more than men with funny ears. They're either too on or too off, when the reality should be something in the middle. The portrayals of Elrond and Celeborn were particularly disappointing.

Those were my biggest criticisms. Here are the minor nits:

  • Gollum's history as a proto-hobbit was lost
  • The encounter with Gildor the Elf in the Shire was removed
  • The evening at Farmer Maggot's was removed
  • Fatty Bolger, the house in Crickhollow, and the Hedge were removed
  • Tom Bombadil, Old Man Willow, and the barrow-wight were cut
  • The dance at Bree was altered
  • Finding the troll from Bilbo's adventure was left out
  • Gandalf's messages at Bree and Amon Sûl were cut
  • Why did they put the horse chase in slow-motion?
  • Arwen professing her love of Aragorn isn't supposed to come until later
  • Bilbo's volunteering to take the Ring was cut, absolutely amazingly!
  • There was no mention of the Elven Rings borne by Elrond and Galadriel
  • I expected Boromir to be larger, rounder, and more red-haired
  • Gollum following them out of Lórien and down the Anduin was not mentioned

But overall, they did a fine job adapting the book to a movie, and what you see is very true to the image that Tolkien created in his book.

LORD OF THE RINGS: THE TWO TOWERS

Unlike The Fellowship of the Ring, this movie strayed quite liberally from Tolkien's books, adding and deleting whole scenes, and altering the basic natures of characters. The most aggregious differences are that in Jackson's movie, Faramir succumbs to the lure of the ring, the Ents decide not to go to war, and Aragorn is missing and presumed dead for a while. While some of the differences were minor nits, some were very substantial.

Another major difference is that the movie ends quite a ways earlier than the books. The books include the reunion and confrontation at Isengard, Pippin and the palantír, and the subsequent separation again, as well as Frodo and Sam's trudge past Minas Morgul, the events at Cirith Ungol, and Frodo's capture while Sam bears the ring.

While some deletions must be made to keep the film's length reasonable, I can't understand why a director would take an immensely popular literary work and stray so far from the original as to add completely fabricated plot elements and dramatically alter the basic natures of important characters. There's no logic in that.

Here's the laundry list of noteworthy differences from the book:

  • In the movie, Pippin simply spits the Elven cloak clasp onto the ground, rather than working his hands free and running some distance from the main path of his captors. The descent into Rohan from the Emyn Muil was deleted.
  • The entire orc rivalry and Pippin's luring Grishnákh by pretending to have the ring was cut! An orc pursues the hobbits into Fangorn in the movie, whereas in the book, the hobbits chance upon Treebeard on a sunny ledge. In the book, Fangorn did not bring the hobbits to see "the white wizard".
  • There is no mention of the Entwives, no Ent-draught, and no appearrance of Quickbeam. Amazingly, in the movie the Entmoot decides not to participate in the war, contrary to the book!
  • Éomer gives the horses to the three hunters freely, rather than grudgingly and requiring Aragorn to return them to Edoras. Gimli has no apparent reluctance riding horses in the movie. Gimli's character in the movie is purely as comic relief, which really demeans his role and presence.
  • The loss of the horses and the three hunters' nighttime visitation by a white wizard were cut.
  • Unbelievably, Aragorn never tells Éomer or Théoden or Háma about Andúril or the fact that he is the rightful king of Gondor!
  • There is an actual fight in Meduseld's halls. Furthermore, Théoden's recovery is depicted much more along the lines of an exorcism, whereas in the book Gandalf mostly simply convinces the king to throw off Gríma's counsel! There is never any mention that Théoden's sword is stashed away in Gríma's quarters.
  • Éowyn doesn't lead the women and children to safety at Dunharrow, but tags along to Helm's Deep with the boys! The entire warg attack was not in the book, nor was Aragorn's fall and subsequent separation from the main host.
  • In the book, Elrond never sent any Elves to fight at Helm's Deep. There's no mention of Erkenbrand's forces. Aragorn sallies forth with Gimli, rather than Legolas. The appearance of the Entwood at Helm's Deep is cut.
  • Frodo and Sam's fall and the use of the Elven rope that was Galadriel's gift to Samwise to descend from the Emyn Muil was lost.
  • Sam's bumbling fall and near-detection at the gates of Mordor did not happen in the book.
  • In the book, Faramir refuses the ring, passing the test in the same manner as Galadriel. However, the movie twists it so that he lusts for the ring, and attempts to take Frodo and Sam back to Gondor! The entire attack on Osgiliath did not appear in the book.
  • The movie ends prematurely, without depicting anything about the reunion at Isengard, the confrontation with Saruman, Pippin and the palantír, the trek past Minas Morgul and Cirith Ungol, Shelob, or Frodo's capture and Sam's period as ringbearer.

Still, despite the rather liberal interpretation of a work that many people dote on, and the fact that even the book is mostly filled with battles or the ringbearer's plodding along, the movie was reasonably enjoyable. I suspect that it will wind up being much like the Fellowship, in that subsequent viewings will enable me to ignore the differences and enjoy it simply for itself. Furthermore, I suspect that like the Fellowship, the Two Towers will probably come out with an expanded DVD containing extra footage, which will hopefully include much of the substantial deleted material.

LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING

If the Fellowship was “mostly true to the book”, and the Two Towers “strayed quite liberally” from them, the Return of the King was an outright butcher job.

It didn’t help that Jackson decided to end the Two Towers film far short of where Tolkien’s book left us. Because of that, Jackson had to fit an additional third of a book into the final, climactic Return of the King film, which itself contains enough material to exceed a single film. The result was a film that, despite running to three and a half hours, still gave us an emasculated Return of the King.

While that might sound a little hash given that Jackson’s slashing didn’t dramatically change the basic storyline, I think that anyone with the brazen audacity to attempt a LotR movie should endeavor to depict the books as faithfully as possible. While Jackson did significantly better than previous attempts, when push come to shove, literary fidelity lost out to expeditiousness and editorial caprice, resulting in a work that, despite beginning well, ended very poorly.

So what did Jackson do in Return of the King that was so egregious? Are you buckled in?

  • The entire confrontation between Gandalf and Saruman and the breaking of Saruman’s staff were deleted.
  • Rather than being thrown at Gandalf by Gríma Wormtongue, the palantír is found in a pool of water by Pippin.
  • Rather than looking into the palantír on the road alone, Pippin looks into it at Edoras, with Merry looking on.
  • At the time, Aragorn also grabs the palantír and looks into it, but no further mention is made of it in the movie. In the book, Aragorn later uses the palantír at Helm’s Deep to reveal himself to Sauron as the returned King of Gondor in order to further pressure Sauron to move before he is ready.
  • In the movie, Aragorn and Gandalf accompany Théoden to Edoras. In the book, Gandalf and Pippin leave before the company returns to Helm’s Deep or Edoras, and Aragorn goes to Dunharrow directly from Helm’s Deep.
  • In the movie, Gandalf is despondent at Edoras. Totally out of character.
  • In the book, Halbarad and the remnants of the Dúnadain join Aragorn at Helm’s Deep and go with him via Dunharrow on the Paths of the Dead, as do Elrond’s sons Elladan and Elrohir. They bring both the king’s standard and counsel from Elrond regarding the Paths of the Dead. All this was cut from the movie.
  • In the movie, the Grey Company’s horses bolted at the gates to the Paths of the Dead. In the book, they don’t.
  • Absolutely no mention is made of the corpse the Grey Company encounters on the Paths.
  • The book has Aragorn summon the Dead to the Stone of Erech, where they debate before joining him; the movie doesn’t mention Erech, and the debate occurs in the tunnels.
  • In the movie, the muster of Rohan takes place in Dunharrow, not Edoras.
  • The whole bit about Arwen going to the havens and turning back did not appear in the book. Nor did the ridiculous crap of her taking ill as a result of Sauron’s strength.
  • In the movie, Andúril is reforged and brought to Aragorn at Dunharrow by Elrond. In the book, it was reforged prior to the fellowship’s departure from Rivendell, and Aragorn bore it thence.
  • Throughout the movies, Elrond is depicted as selfish and negative, completely out of character.
  • The whole scene where Gandalf has Pippin light Minas Tirith's beacon never happened in the book.
  • Bergil and Beregond and their friendship with Pippin do not appear at all.
  • Prince Imrahil of Dol Amroth was removed entirely.
  • The movie had Pippin go with Gandalf to assist Faramir’s retreat from Osgiliath.
  • The song Pippin sings to Denethor (“Upon the hearth the fire is red”) only appears in the trilogy when the hobbits are leaving the Shire, between the encounter with the black rider that drives them off the road and their meeting Gildor. It is most emphatically not a plainchant. It is described as a walking song, and Pippin ends it in a particularly high and emphatic “And now to bed!”
  • What is up with Gandalf’s Kosmik Karate against Denethor? That wasn’t in the book and is totally out of character for Gandalf.
  • Beregond’s saving Faramir from Denethor was removed, and Denethor is amazingly accidentally killed by Gandalf. In the book, Denethor kills himself, with the palantír in his hands.
  • The movie barely even depicts one of the most important symbols of power: the lack of a dawn during Sauron’s strength, and the return of the light during his defeat.
  • The entire ride of the Rohirrim is deleted, including the Woses and Ghân-buri-Ghân.
  • In the movie, Éowyn and Merry and Faramir tag along for the march to the gates of Mordor. In the book, they are all near death in the Houses of Healing. Ioreth professes that the hands of the king ae the hands of a healer, and Aragorn confirms his royalty by finding some athelas and healing them before the march to the gate. While recovering back in Minas Tirith, Éowyn and Faramir’s romance blossoms. Amazingly, all this was completely cut from the movie.
  • The parley with the Mouth of Sauron was deleted.
  • The scene where Gollum tosses the lembas never appeared in the book.
  • It is totally and utterly out of character for Frodo to side with Gollum and abandon Sam, telling him to go home. Complete fabrication.
  • Sam’s following the orcs beneath Cirith Ungol is deleted, as is his lengthy use of the Ring and resulting reputation as a mighty Elf warrior. The Watchers outside Cirith Ungol are also completely deleted.
  • In the movie, Sam tells Frodo that he doesn’t expect there to be a return journey; in the book, Frodo tells Sam.
  • Frodo and Sam’s “capture” and forced march by orcs from Durthang was also completely deleted.
  • Aragorn’s final confirmation of kingship—finding a sapling of the White Tree—was also cut.
  • Sharkey/Saruman’s destruction of the Shire was completely cut, eviscerating the end of the book and the hobbits’ reputation as heroes within the Shire.

As you can see, Jackson only depicted about 60% of Tolkien’s final volume, and introduced some capricious and lamentable additions of his own devising. From the standpoint of capturing what Tolkien wrote, both in terms of specific details as well as the wonder and magic, Jackson’s Return of the King is a dreadful finale to a project that started out pretty promising.

As for the trilogy overall, it’s still a pretty good effort. Capturing Tolkien is not something that could be easily done, and Jackson made a far better showing than any previous attempt. Still, I think it became obvious that he’d bitten off more than he could digest when he moved a third of the Two Towers from the second to the third movie, and even a three and a half hour running time couldn’t accomodate the amount of material that needs to be depicted in order to do justice to the story.

Is it worth seeing? Yes. Is it faithful to the books? Moreso than any other attempt, but I’d say it only gets a C+ for fidelity. Is it an utter failure? No, Jackson did well within the constraints he was given.

In the end, I did enjoy the movies. They were entertaining, and I hope that they inspire yet another generation of fans who will accept fantasy as a valid literary genre, and then mature from more juvenile high fantasy to the more adult low fantasy that DargonZine publishes.

Sorry, but this one’s gonna be as brief as last week’s, since I can’t answer these questions.

If your life were a movie, what would the title be?
What songs would be on the soundtrack?
Would it be a live-action film or animated? Why?
Casting: who would play you, members of your family, friends, etc?
Describe the movie preview/trailer.

Yaknow, I wouldn’t harp so much about how I don’t watch television or movies, except that people insist on bringing the topic up incessantly…

How are you planning to spend the summer [winter]?
This summer’s goals are finish up a couple stories I’m writing for DargonZine, finding a new job, and training for and completing my third Pan-Mass Challenge, a 200-mile charity bike ride to benefit cancer research and treatment. If you’re interested in helping me reach my fundraising goal, either email me or go here.
 
What was your first summer job?
When I was about fifteen I began working as a counselor at a YMCA day camp. My first year, I think I was paid $25. Later, I’d have my marriage ceremony at the same lakeside camp.
 
If you could go anywhere this summer [winter], where would you go?
Probably Scotland. I’d really like to have more time to explore the countryside.
 
What was your worst vacation ever?
I’m not sure it qualifies as a “vacation”, but the celebration at the end of the Staples project was the most dismal that I recall. The consultancy we worked at gave us a comp day, but it the weather was raw, windy, and rain-sodden. I spent more than two hours on a bus with my coworkers, some of whom were fine and some of whom were the kind of people you’d pay money to avoid. We were dumped off on a sleazy patch of slag near the ocean, and left for two or three hours to freeze in the rainstorm (yes, the bus left). When the bus finally returned to pick us up, someone had the wonderful idea that we could really cap this celebration off by going to a theater and all watching the tedious and formulaic X-Men movie before our two-hour bus ride home. Looking back on it, it was thoroughly painful and disheartening, and a truly pathetic way for our employer to thank us for the months of long hours the project had required.
 
What was your best vacation ever?
I’d have to say it was last year’s Scotland Dargon Writers’ Summit. Twelve days driving around the country, sightseeing, accompanied by some of my closest friends.
Would you consider yourself an organized person? Why or why not?
I am the most organized person you have ever heard of. I constantly surprise and amaze even the most anal-retentive people. I actually scare most “normal” people, because I combine an obsessive degree of organization with an inhuman level of competence, yielding an incisive, near-infallible mind that is computerlike in its effectiveness and efficiency.
 
Do you keep some type of planner, organizer, calendar, etc. with you, and do you use it regularly?
At present my preferred method of planning is a paper-based system which I designed and developed. The calendar section contains two weeks of time/date dependent appointments, along with recurring appointments and multi-day appointments. I have a “need to buy” section, a “general to-do list”, a “future LiveJournal posts” section, a list of “long-term to-dos”, a list of high-priority social contacts I want to cultivate, a “DargonZine to-do list”, a list of my present DargonZine writing projects, and a list of DargonZine stories which I need to critique. Items are added or carried over to the next sheet as needed.
 
Items which are completed are lined out in red marker; items which I do not complete are crossed out in blue marker. In addition, items which will eventually appear in OrnothLand are given red boxes, which are checked off when I have added them to the Web site. Anything DargonZine-related gets lined out with a thin red pen, rather than the usual thick one, until I have posted about it in the project “news” post that I send to my writers each week, at which time it gets the thick red line.
 
All this fits on one side of an 8½ by 11 sheet of paper. I generally do not carry this planner with me.
 
In the past I’ve been known to use the Xircom (nee Franklin) REX as a PDA. It’s a PCMCIA card that’s also a PDA. Unfortunately, Franklin was bought by Xircom was bought by Intel who then just decided to stop making consumer electronics of any type, so there is no more REX. I have never used any other PDA or Palm device. I used Microsoft Outlook briefly, before concluding that I could write a better system myself.
 
Note that this doesn’t include any task-specific planners, such as the DargonZine global status report, the three DZ publication queues and schedules, my cycling graphs and logs and planners, the numerous personal task lists that I maintain in Ilium Software’s ListPro (formerly Netmanage Ecco).
 
Would you say that your desk is organized right now?
My desk is, of course, perfectly organized. I have a roll-top desk with fourteen separate compartments, two small drawers, and four large drawers. The compartments hold: (1) paid bills; (2) business cards, letter opener, and stereo remote controls; (3) unpaid bills due in the next 15 days; (4) checkbooks and payment books; (5) my old REX card (see above); (6) sunglasses and combat knife; (7) and (8) empty, because they’re inaccessible behind my PC; (9) wallet cards that I don’t need to carry daily, such as wholesale club card, calling card, grocery store cards, and blackjack betting strategy; (10) computer reference cards for Javascript, perl, CSS, Kedit, emacs, Adobe Type Library; (11) infrequently-used reference material such as floor plans to the Museum of Fine Arts and Boston Public Library; (12) legal documents such as my passport, mother’s will, safe deposit box keys; (13) computer speakers and CDs full of MP3s; (14) folder with resume material, plus DargonZine folders including printouts of the queue of stories to be reviewed, a printout of the issue currently in production, and printouts of the stories I’m currently working on. The small drawers contain (1) software installation CD-ROMs; (2) old computer punch cards (remember those, kids?) for use as notepads. The drawers contain (1) pens, stapler, tape, the top-drawer usual desk stuff; (2) garbage computer stuff, including voice microcassette recorder and my collection of four dozen Caps Lock keys; (3) Visa and ATM receipts for the past year; (4) computer equipment, including blank CD-ROMs, digital camera, media reader, canned air, and system backup CDs. The desk also has a pull-out witing surface, which is where I keep my bi-weekly planning paper.
 
Do you alphabetize CDs, books, and DVDs, or does it not matter?
CDs are sorted by artist and subsorted by date of initial release. Compilations go at the top, except for CMJ compilations, which are at the bottom. The dozen annual Orny Sampler compilations are also in a separate section. Genres are mixed.
 
Books have always been a royal pain in the ass, due to nonstandard sizing. I vastly prefer trade paperbacks for their uniformity and efficient storage. The latter are stored, again, by author and subsorted by original publication date. I’ve never found an adequate method of storing overside books; some are stored by topic, and some are stored by size. I have separate shelves for computer reference books, philosophy, sexuality, Roman history, Boston’s topographical and architectural history, writing, cycling, and languages. There’s also a separate shelf in the living room that highlights a rolling list of the last two dozen books I’ve read.
 
I only own three DVDs (since I have no player or television, for that matter). They are piled in my CD cabinet. Two are animated feature films, and the third is the DVD highlighting the 2002 Dargon Writers’ Summit in Scotland that Dargon writer Victor Cardoso produced for the group.
 
What’s the hardest thing you’ve ever had to organize?
I have a very firm belief that all complexity is of human origin; there is nothing complex or unpredictable that cannot be traced directly back to people. Specifically, other people, since I make such a substantial effort to be predictable, reliable, responsible, use forethought, and set others’ expectations appropriately, and most people are by nature fallible, inconsistent, capricious, and irresponsible.
 
From that, you should be able to derive my opinion that the most difficult things I’ve ever had to organize have been other people. Any time I’ve been responsible for others, whether it be one of the wargaming conventions I ran as an adolescent, producing DargonZine as I’ve done for so many years, or the DargonZine Writers’ Summits I’ve organized for the past decade, the hardest job has always been organizing and managing the people involved. It certainly would be easier if everyone else were as compulsively organized as myself, but if that were the case, then those events I have organized would never have been such wonderful accomplishments.
 
Besides, if everyone were as organized as me, I wouldn’t be so unique in this world anymore, and then I’d need to find another outlet for my smug sense of superiority.

If you could only choose 1 cd to ever listen to again, what would it be?
Well, I'm torn between two. First, there's the Toasters' 1998 "Live in London" disc. It really captures the essence of their incredible and energetic live shows at the height of their skill. And, of course, it's ska, which is practically a necessity of life! Songs like "2-Tone Army" and "Weekend in L.A." are pure happiness, built to order.
 
Then there's the industrial might of KMFDM's 1995 "Nihil". Their most polished effort, "Nihil" is an angry stomp through a world of angst and misery. Songs like "Ultra", "Juke Joint Jezebel", "Flesh", "Disobedience", and "Trust" all set the tone of submission and preversion that reaches a crushing crescendo in "Brute", the most compelling song of submission I've ever heard:
Touch me — hate me
Give yourself to me and break me
Cut these eyes and I will see
Kiss these lying lips for me
Stroke this skin and I will kneel
Brutalize me; I will heal
If you could only choose 2 movies to watch ever again, what would they be?
Although I generally dislike movies, perhaps that's why I find this one easy to answer. The first and obvious answer is Richard Linklater's 2002 "Waking Life", a rotoscoped nonlinear romp through pop philosophy. It's a saturation-bombing of introspection for a slacker population who haven't yet woken up to the real questions of life, and is thus an absolute treasure trove of questions for the enquiring mind. Don't leave home without it!
 
My other selection is a little more embarassing: "Star Trek: the Wrath of Khan". People really don't seem to realize what a literary masterpiece WoK really is. From a writers' standpoint, it does an expectional job of using all the literary elements: character development and change, dramatic tension and action scenes, a believable but larger than life villain, several archetypes, incredible imagery, unexpected plot twists, and above all it manipulates the viewers' emotions with a skill that most movies fail to accomplish. And on top of it all, virtually every line of dialogue is fantastically quotable! It's an amazing piece of writing, and no matter how stupid it might sound, it really does make my list of movies that are actually worth seeing.
 
If you could only choose 3 books to read ever again, what would they be?
I suppose, as a writer, I ought to have an opinion here, but I don't. To be honest, there aren't many books that I really find very compelling. For me, books are pretty interchangeable, at least those designed to entertain. But if I really had to make a list, here's what might get considered:
 
  • Tanith Lee's "Cyrion" (good atmosphere)
  • Something from Terry Pratchett (good humor, but they're all interchangeable)
  • Elizabeth Scarborough's "Song of Sorcery" (good "innocent" fantasy)
  • Michael Shea's "The Color Out of Time" (like Lovecraft, only well-written!)
  • Clark Ashton Smith's "Monster of the Prophesy" (one of the trailblazers of horror and fantasy)
  • Bram Stoker's "The Jewel of Seven Stars" (even better than his "Dracula")
 
If you could only choose 4 things to eat or drink ever again, what would they be?
  • Ice cream (one of the necessities of life; either chocolate chip, or Haagen-Dazs' Cookies & Cream)
  • Coca-Cola (an ancient addiction)
  • Some form of chicken curry (Indian food, and meat!)
  • Baby carrots (fresh garden veggies steeped in butter!)
 
If you could only choose 5 people to ever be/talk/associate/whatever with ever again, who would they be?
  • Inna — One of the most insightful and interesting people I know. She's helped me really come into my own as a person, and is quite the cutie!
  • Ailsa — Each time she's come into my life, she's heralded major change, and always for the better. She's been my role model for successfully incorporating emotion and impulsiveness into my otherwise very staid personality. And she's a cutie!
  • Rhonda — Another woman who helps me explore that part of life that I don't understand, Rhonda has an intuitive grasp of emotion. And as a fellow writer, I appreciate her intellect and skill. And she's a cutie, as well.
  • Pam — Unlike the others, Pam is me in a woman's body. She seems to understand me in a way other women can't: she empathizes with my social ineptitude as well as my passion for perfection and order. She knows what it's like to be happy being alone, and things like that connect us in a rare "kindred spirit" kind of way. And being a writer, she understands what I'm about. And she's a cutie!
  • Margot — Margot is also a writer, as well as an artist, and I really appreciate her intelligence and her supportiveness. And wouldn't you know it? She's a cutie, too!

Yesterday, as I was driving Inna to the airport, we passed a billboard for the new movie "Enough". Inna made a comment about how she'd had more than her fill of the leading actress, Jennifer Lopez, who apparently is an all-pervasive mass media star. I shrugged and told her that there were definite benefits to not being saturated by the mass media; I couldn't have named the actress for any amount of money, nor do I have any idea what she's done before "Enough" or why she's popular.

You see, I made a decision years ago to try an experiment. At the time, I was moving into Boston proper and decided to stop watching television, stop going to movies, and sell my car. That was eight years ago, and I've never had reason to reconsider.

Why? Well, let's start with the car. After I moved into town, I found that I really wasn't using it much. Then I calculated that it was costing me about $9000 a year to have, between car payments, repairs, maintenance, gas, parking, tolls, excise tax, tickets, insurance, and everything else. It just wasn't worth it. So I started buying MBTA passes, broke out the bike again, walked more, had my groceries delivered, and rented or borrowed a car for the rare times I really needed one. All in all, losing the car turned out to be a big win. I do miss it sometimes, simply for the joy of driving, but that's hardly worth $9000 a year to me.

Giving up movies wasn't a big deal, because I've never been a big moviegoer. I really only mention it because it's one of those things that people can't seem to fathom living without. But I find most movies, especially American movies, painfully formulaic and predictable, and my need for dramatic storytelling is well fulfilled by the reading I have to do for DargonZine. The way I figured it, there are better ways to spend $20 and three hours of my life. These days I do go out to see a few very carefully selected movies, but very few, and rarely anything that's "big" or mainstream.

But giving up television? That tends to shock a lot of people. Back in '94, when I looked at what I was going out of my way to watch (Jeopardy, NASCAR auto racing, and NBA basketball), I just couldn't justify spending $35 per month for cable. The final straw -- virtually the last thing I saw before pulling the plug -- was the pathetically overdramatized OJ Simpson "low-speed chase" along the highways of Los Angeles. So when I moved, I didn't bother ordering cable, and figured I'd see how long I could survive. Amazingly, my life did actually get better. I had more time for writing and DargonZine, cycling, concertgoing, work, and sleep. So it's become a permanent situation.

Often people wonder how I possibly get my news without television. Actually, I find myself far better informed about the things I care about then anyone around me, and I often "scoop" my friends with news they haven't heard yet. I get concert listings and local happenings from the Boston Phoenix, the local alternative paper. But most of my news comes from the Internet. The Boston Globe's Boston.com site is a great source for local and national news. I supplement that with My Yahoo! for local, national, NBA, financial, and technology news. I get local weather directly from the National Weather Service, rather than a dumbed-down version edited by a 7th grade dropout with a toupee and the pseudoscientific title of "Meteorologist".

But beyond that, I am able to get more detailed news about specific areas of interest that television could never provide. I get future show dates for all my favorite local and national bands. I get tons of international cycling news and remarkable photography, as well as all kinds of news about local cycling. I get to read the comic strips that I specifically want, including the bisexual, polyamorous, BDSM-oriented "Jake the Rake". I get in-depth local transportation news. Complete weekly open house listings for my neighborhood. Event calendars for local early music, classical music, art studios, and author signings and readings. Upcoming album releases. Visiting warships. Detailed user interface design and Web developer news. Tons of local news from Boston, or my original home town, high school, college, or places I'd like to visit. Live flight data so that I can pick friends up at the airport without waiting. Financial news as soon as it's released. Try getting any of that through your boob tube! But I shouldn't need to tell you about the value of the Internet as a news medium.

Instead, I'll tell you what I lost when I gave up television: saturation by the mass media. I gave up knowing (or caring) who the hell Jennifer Lopez is. I gave up being bombarded by the same old inane and intentionally-annoying commercials, repeated several thousand times per year. I gave up having to sit through the tedium of the news media's fixation on one event for months at a time (the OJ trial, the Florida election recount, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, whatever they're following this year). Apparently I didn't give up anything worth keeping, because eight years later, I still haven't called the cable company.

Well, except to hook up my cable modem, of course...

Yes, I admit that I take a reactionary pleasure in telling people that I don't watch television. I enjoy shocking people. But if that were the only benefit, it wouldn't be worth it at all. In all honesty, I'm now endlessly better informed, have become more physically active, taken a more participatory role in my community, and gotten rid of the truckloads of annoyances and pointless angst that come with television saturation. The reason why I don't watch television is because my life's immensely better without it, as was so obviously demonstrated by Inna's irritation versus my complete lack of reaction to seeing a billboard featuring Jennifer Lopez... whoever she is.

Kill your television.
It's a no-brainer.

Frequent topics