Date: 2007-10-14 01:25 pm (UTC)
It's true that certain people can be proficient under unix. On the other hand, I work with highly technically trained developers who have worked under unix for years, and who enthusiastically advance its universal adoption as a desktop computing platform. And I am amazed when I see how much of their time is spent rebuilding a corrupted file system, patching drivers, and figuring out unnecessarily arcane syntax for performing simple everyday tasks. Even for that highly specialized and motivated population, it doesn't seem like a very effective solution.

And I'm not necessarily a Windows proponent. It does seem stable and interoperable, and mostly usable even by non techies. But it's no panacaea by a long shot. OSX also has its adherents, although I find it pretty unintuitive myself.

What I wish we had was a decent desktop version of VM/SP, which had evolved along with the times. Thirty years ago it had complete virtualization, rock-solid stability, a mostly intuitive command set, what is still the best text and programming editor on the planet, and a forgiving and easy to learn but powerful shell/macro programming language.

Someday maybe we'll get a decent computing platform that's built new from the ground up. But so far any attempt to do so has failed miserably (NeXT, Amiga, OS2...)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Frequent topics